| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ Remove sys_kill() as we should be using a two-stage process where a
thread is first orphaned by sys_detach(), and then the thread itself
calls sys_exit() after it has done all necessary cleanup in init.
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ A bit easier to implement just ignoring the ipc_resp() arguments than
try to enforce that a notification is exited from by ipc_ghost(),
especially in cases where the root process has been killed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ Currently analyzer has to be run manually with something like
make CFLAGS='-fanalyzer -Wno-analyzer-infinite-loop'
I use an infinite loop as an assert, I know it's not great/technically
UB but it's just a fallback.
+ Analyzer is still somewhat limited, I could add in more
attributes about different functions, such as memory allocation sizes
etc.
+ If I ever set up a CI pipeline, remember to use analyzer?
|
|
+ ipc_kick() does a forward and a tail at the same time
The idea with ipc_tail() is to allow 'trusted' calls, so for example a
process is not allowed to willy-nilly open a file, as it has to go via
init(), making the eid 1. This way the receiver can know that the
request has gone through init() and can open up a new connection
(file, whatever) after which requests from that pid/tid are allowed
without init() intervention
|
|
+ Accidentally included, should really be more observant
|
|
+ At least by my standards. Some amount of scripting going on, but
should still be fine.
Effectively, source.mk contains information to build the test,
check.mk checks the generated log from running the test. As a results,
check.mk should output OK into reports/$TEST/OK if everything went
well, and anything else otherwise. The user can then look at
reports/$TEST/log to see what went wrong.
I expect to add some more features, such as starting QEMU with gdb and
running a single test a bit easier than right now (same limitation as
in the top level makefile, i.e. you have to specify
make -f scripts/makefile $TEST
from within `tests` and you must have ran `make check` at that point
so that `tests.mk` is fully generated. Not huge issues, but slightly
annoying, somewhat unsure how to work around them properly but we'll
see.
|
|
|
|
+ Current setup will likely not last long, just a stopgap until I figure
out how I want to build each testcase etc.
Probably dir based, but I'll probably add some scripts that generate
the build rules for each test case (or binary?). Also, should probably
put ouput files in a build directory and keep the source clean, but
again, good enough for now.
Will have to start implementing more extensive tests, and probably
come up with some way to compare textual output etc.
|
